Showing posts with label tv. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tv. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Truth of Ipc 498a - Misuse and Abuse - Tool for Extortion and Blackmailing and Harassing Indian husband and his family

Truth of Ipc 498a - Misuse and Abuse - Tool for Extortion, Blackmailing and Harassing Indian husbands and his family

On Hum Log - A programme on News Nation Channel televised on 18 June 2015

Video Credits and Courtesy:- News Nation TV channel

Thursday, June 4, 2015

INDIAN Men and Husbands face Domestic Violence. Misuse of ipc 498a (Anti Dowry), DV acts, Anti Rape laws

INDIAN Men and Husbands face Domestic Violence. Misuse of ipc 498a (Anti Dowry), DV acts, Anti Rape laws - A programme on News Nation Hum Log 04Jun2015

Video Credits and Courtesy:- News Nation TV channel

Monday, March 23, 2015

Centre set to prevent misuse of anti-dowry harassment law - Mulling to make it Compoundable. Bailable is solution ? Adding Misuse clause ?

Centre set to prevent misuse of anti-dowry harassment law - Mulling to make it Compoundable. 

Bailable is solution ?

Adding Misuse clause ?


Debate on FOCUS NEWS channel telecasted LIVE on 23 March 2015





Panelists :-

Amit lakhani, Social Activist, Save Indian Family (SIF).
Rekha Agarwal, Supreme Court Advocate.
RS Goswami, Former president, Bar Council. 
Nisha Khanna, Counselor.
Meena Sharma, Anchor, Focus News.


Video Courtesy and Credits - FOCUS NEWS channel


Detailed news at

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/dowry-law-section-498-a-ipc-centre-narendra-modi-nda/1/423362.html

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Steady-increase-in-number-of-women-filing-false-cases-against-husbands/articleshow/46452475.cms

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-03-11/news/60008620_1_law-commission-draft-bill-compoundable#

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Madhu Kishwar debates on Maneka Gandhi WCD minister's proposed amendment of Domestic Violence Act to protect Mothers-in-laws

Madhu Kishwar debates on Rajya Sabha TV on 23rd July 2014 on topic of Maneka Gandhi WCD minister's proposed amendment of Domestic Violence Act to protect Mothers-in-laws 
Panelists include
Madhu Purnima Kishwar of Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS)
Nalin Kohli, BJP spokesperson
Priya Hingorani, SC lawyer/Feminist
Prof. Vivek Kumar, Sociology, JNU
Anchored by Arafaan Khanam Sherwani



Friday, July 4, 2014

DD NEWS (Hindi) Debate on SC Judgement (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on 03 July 2014

DD NEWS (Hindi) Debate on SC Judgement   (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on  03 July 2014

Swaroop Sarkar of SIF talks tough on Misuse of ipc 498a Domestic violence and other Women centric Gender Biased Laws. Exposes Politicians Feminists Media Bias

Full text of SC (Arnesh Kr) order @ http://bit.ly/1ooV9V2




Youtube Playlist SIF Participation - TV Media Debates on SC Judgement (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on 03 July 2014

Youtube Playlist
SIF Participation - TV Media  Debates on SC Judgement (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on 03 July 2014

Full text of SC (Arnesh Kr) order @ http://bit.ly/1ooV9V2


Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj on Debate on SC Judgement (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate

Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj on Debate on SC Judgement (Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on INDIA TV 03 July 2014

Full text of SC (Arnesh Kr) order @ http://bit.ly/1ooV9V2


Swarrop Sarkar of Save Indian Family (SIF) DD NEWS Debate on SC Judgement ( Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc) for Police and Magistrate

Debate on SC Judgement ( Arnesh Kr) on Misuse of 498a, Arrest Guidelines laid (As per s41 crpc ) for Police and Magistrate on  DD NEWS (English) 03 July 2014

Swaroop Sarkar of SIF talks tough on Misuse of ipc 498a Domestic violence and other Women centric Gender Biased Laws. Exposes Politicians Feminists Media Bias

Full text of SC (Arnesh Kr) order @ http://bit.ly/1ooV9V2


Thursday, July 3, 2014

TV Media Debate on SC Judgement on ipc 498a Misuse and automatic arrests in 498a ,guidelines laid for Police and Magistrates u/s s41 crpc- SIF Participation

TV Media  Debate on SC Judgement on ipc 498a Misuse and automatic arrests in 498a ,guidelines laid for Police and Magistrates u/s s41 crpc- SIF Participation


Shonee Kapoor and Amol Khurhe on
ABP News 
ABP News debate -1 : Is the dowry law being misused in the country?

ABP News Live debate - 2 : Badi Behas- Is the dowry law being misused in the country?

On IBN7 - प्रश्नकाल: दहेज विरोधी कानून का दुरुपयोग? http://khabar.ibnlive.in.com/videos/123052
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7nRrVl9xiU

Swaroop Sarkar on 
On CNNIBN - No Dowry arrests till magistrate's nodhttp://ibnlive.in.com/videos/483531/no-dowry-arrests-till-magistrates-nod-share-your-views.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnRT_VwsyFE&feature=youtu.be

Swarup sarkar on IndiaNews
No arrest on mere allegations in dowry harassment cases: Supreme Court
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0bMiT8iEwY&feature=youtu.be

Ritwik Bisaria 
On NDTV India ( Hindi ) बड़ी खबर : दहेज विरोधी कानून में गिरफ्तारी जरूरी?
http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/badi-khabar/badi-khabar-arrest-necessary-in-section-498-a/328461

Amit lakhani on News24
Debate : Anti-dowry law misused, no automatic arrest in such cases: SC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucgYprAZTYE&feature=youtu.be
Sabse Bada Sawaal: Is anti-dowry law 'Legal Terrorism'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do9It0CZ6IY&feature=youtu.be

Legal Experts share views on News24
Anti-dowry law misused, no automatic arrest in such cases: SC


Deepika Narayan on
On NDTV India (Hindi)
प्राइम टाइम : दहेज मामलों में गिरफ्तारी कितनी अहम?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd6sYIKBxVQ

On Focus News Focus News Special - Khauff Ka Kanaun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N03Pwks10cQ

NitiCentral
Deepika Narayan speaks on Misuse of 498a and Supreme court directs to stop 'automatic' arrests under dowry prevention law
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EbME0EDzLk


Zee News
No arrest on mere allegations in dowry harassment cases: SC


TV 9 marathi
Women MISUSING Anti-Dowry Law, Says SC
Part1  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_9k_bMfksI
Part 2  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Ugj7lAvSk
Part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUVuYhGWJ0Q
Part 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaYClu_GRZY


ABP Majha 

ABP Majha Vishesh : Dowry Law section 498A of IPC

Day & Night News
Prime (Hindi) - Women Misusing India's Anti-Dowry Law


P7News24x7

Women Misusing India's Anti-Dowry Law, Says Supreme Court









Saturday, January 18, 2014

Delhi HC grants temporary relief to J. Swatanter Kumar; Restraint on publishing details of allegations, use of J. Kumar's photograph

Delhi HC grants temporary relief to J. Swatanter Kumar; Restraint on publishing details of allegations, use of J. Kumar's photograph

Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to Justice Swatanter Kumar in the defamation suit filed by J Kumar (Petitioner) against media houses seeking to restrain them from publishing news pertaining to the law intern’s allegation of sexual harassment (except judicial orders) and claiming damages to the extent of Rs. 5 crore.
Justice Manmohan Singh, in an interim order running to 42 pages, has restrained the media from publishing or airing content on the intern harassment case till the next date of hearing to be held on February 24, 2013. The Court has also directed the media to not use J. Kumar's picture in any of the news articles published in connection with this case. The restrictions on reporting however, do not apply to court proceedings related to the allegations.
Justice Kumar, who has been accused of sexually harassing a law intern, had filed the suit against Indian Express, CNN IBN, Times Now and the law intern (Respondents) alleging that the manner in which the Respondents had reported the news pertaining to the intern's affidavit was deliberate and with the intent to “defame the plaintiff and the institutions dispensing justice”. The plaint has also impleaded the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. 
He has also claimed that the Respondent media houses proceeded to reveal his name as the accused in the matter despite him categorically informing them that the allegations against him were false and publication of his name would cause irreparable damage to his reputation. The retired judge also claimed that the allegations were, "baseless, fraudulent and motivated in their entirety".
In his plaint, settled by Senior Advocate Maninder Singh and re-settled by Senior Advocates Rajiv Nayar, AS Chandhiok and Mukul Rohatgi, Justice Kumar states,
“The reckless and irresponsible action of the Defendants 1 to 4 seeking to increase their circulation and TRPs at the cost of the reputation of the Plaintiff and his public office have caused grave and irreparable injury to the Plaintiff and degraded the dignity of the Institution of Justice....Defendant no. 5 caused the publication of her false complaint to the media both print as well as electronic. The said acts of Defendants no. 1 to 5 lowered the esteem of the Plaintiff in the estimation of the public at large and his colleagues, staff, peers and members of his social circle.”
During the hearing yesterday afternoon in a packed courtroom no. 21, Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi appearing for Justice Kumar, had taken strong objection to the manner in which the Respondents had reported news pertaining to the intern’s affidavit. Waving around copies of Indian Express and Mail Today, he had protested against newspapers lifting “juicy lines from the affidavit” and making front page headlines out of it terming it as yellow journalism.
He had also objected to the Respondent TV Channels airing debates and discussions centred on the contents of the affidavit and passing judgments on the character of the judge. He had further submitted that the said acts of the Respondents had not only impacted the reputation of the Petitioner but also besmirched the integrity of the Supreme Court and the entire judiciary.
The Court after hearing the Petitioner and the Respondents had reserved its order yesterday. Nine Senior Counsels inlcuding Mukul Rohatgi, AS Chandhiok, Rajiv Nayar, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Vinay Bhasin, Maninder Singh and Aman Lekhi represented the Petitioner. Senior Counsels Ashwani Mata and Dinesh Dwivedi appeared for the Respondents.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court had issued notice to Justice Kumar yesterday in the Public Interest Litigation filed by the law intern seeking, amongst other things, the establishment of a permanent mechanism to address complaints of sexual harassment against sitting and retired judicial officers.
Full text of the order is available below.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Supreme Court asks Government to amend law to protect women and children in live-in relationships. Legalising and Promoting Adultery ??

Supreme Court asks Government to amend law to protect women and children in live-in relationships.

Legalising and Promoting Adultery ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3Y_w82Zkq4





CLICK BELOW LINK FOR FULL TEXT OF SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT 
http://bit.ly/Ja7Raq



Should Men be Afraid of Women ? Where are we going ? Jyoti Tiwari on Sahara Samay 06 December 2013

Where are we going ?
Should Men be Afraid of Women ?

Jyoti Tiwari on Sahara Samay 06 December 2013 @11pm
Make the Sexual harassment Law Gender Neutral !
Mere allegations of Sexual harassment lands Men into Jail

"Establish National Commission for MEN"


Part 1of 2




Part 2 of 2






Saturday, December 7, 2013

Sexual Harassment law fallout ! Should or really Men be scared to talk to women, they fear being jailed. Swaroop Sarkar and Jyoti Tiwari expose the reality

Sexual Harassment law fallout ! - Men scared to talk to women, they fear being jailed: Farooq Abdullah



Sexual Harassment law fallout ! Should or really Men be scared to talk to women, they fear being jailed.

Watch Swaroop Sarkar and Jyoti Tiwari show Mirror to Feminists who remain in denial mode as always

Friday, June 21, 2013

Pre-marital sex equals marriage, says Madras HC. Swaroop Sarkar Debate on Zee News 19 June 2013

Pre-marital sex equals marriage, says Madras HC.

Swaroop Sarkar Debate on Zee News 19 June 2013

Video





Pre-marital sex equals marriage, says Madras HC. 

June 18, 2013

An unmarried adult couple will be considered married and can be termed husband and wife if they have sex, the Madras high court has said in a judgment with far-reaching consequences, especially for those in live-in relationships. 


Such a couple could not separate or "marry" a second time without a decree of divorce if it was proved that they shared a sexual relationship, said the court, whose order has been described as regressive and confused.

The judgment has created a furore online, with social media buzzing with angry messages. (click here  to read the operative part of the verdict)

"If any couple, subject to their attaining the mandatory age of freedom,...indulges in sexual gratification, then that would be considered as valid marriage and they would be termed as 'husband and wife', as a result of their choice of freedom," justice CS Karnan said while deciding a maintenance claim in favour of a woman who had two children with a man she was not married to.

The court said if the woman gets pregnant, she would be treated as the 'wife' and the man as the 'husband'.

"The judgment seems to be based on the established rule regarding presumption of marriage but the court has stretched it too far. There was no need for equating sexual relationship with marriage, which undermines the sanctity of marriage," former law commission member Tahir Mahmood said.

"Putting so much emphasis on sex is rather obnoxious. To say that without divorce the parties cannot separate is legally untenable."

The court said marriage formalities of tying a mangalsutra and exchanging rings were only for the satisfaction of society, adding legal aspects should get precedence over customs.

The court reversed a Coimbatore family court's finding that the duo could not be considered a couple as there was no documentary proof of the wedding. The family court had asked the man to pay R500 maintenance a month to his two children but not to the woman.

In signing the birth certificate of his second child and giving consent to a caesarean section, the man had officially admitted that the woman was his wife, the HC said, ordering the man to pay the woman a maintenance of Rs. 500 a month since September 2000, when she filed petition.

The Supreme Court has all along held that if a man and a woman live together for a long period as husband and wife, there is a presumption of valid marriage between them and children born of such relationship have inheritance rights.

But the HC verdict appears to have confused sex with marriage as it describes consummation or sexual interaction as "the main legal aspect for a valid marriage".


-----

Madras HC clarifies pre-marital sex verdict, objects to criticism

PTI Chennai, June 19, 2013

The Madras High Court on Monday took strong objection to criticism of its verdict holding sexual relations between a woman and man of marriageable age, prior to tying the knot, as "a valid wedding" and stoutly defended the order saying it "protected Indian culture and welfare of women."


Two days after he delivered the judgement, which has evoked disapproval and criticisms from various quarters, including on social media, justice CS Karnan said comments should not be made without fully understanding the verdict.

In a clarificatory order, which would be part of the judgement, the judge said "this court's order does not in any way run against any religion and is not intended to wound any Indian. The order had not in any way degraded the system of marriage performed as per the various religious and customs and rites among the various communities." (click here to read the operative part of the verdict)

Justice Karnan further said "this court has given the legal relief to the affected woman. Without fully understanding the court's judgment, adverse comments shall not be passed."

"If a bachelor aged 21 years or above and a spinster aged 18 years or above had premarital sex with the intention to marry and subsequent to this the man deserts the woman, the victim woman can approach a civil forum for remedy after producing necessary substantial evidence to grant her social status as wife. This remedy is not only for the purpose of giving relief to the victim woman but also to maintain the cultural integrity of India," he reiterated.

Justice Karnan had given the judgement on June 18 while modifying an April 2006 judgement of a family court in a maintenance case.

A family court in Coimbatore had ordered a man to pay Rs. 500 maintenance per month to his two children and Rs. 1000 as litigation expenses and had held that the woman's wedding with him did not have any documentary proof.

Monday, March 18, 2013

SP leader detained for allegedly sexually harassing woman - Classic Example of Misuse


SP leader detained for allegedly sexually harassing woman

Lucknow: Samajwadi Party leader Chandranath Singh was detained in a sexual harassment case after a woman travelling on the Padmavati Express complained that he harassed her on Sunday night. The SP leader complained of chest pain and has been admitted to hospital now.

 Videos @

http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/379515/sp-leader-detained-for-allegedly-sexually-harassing-woman.html

http://www.indiatvnews.com/video/former-samajwadi-mp-arrested-for-molesting-girl-on-train--14664.22.html

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Aadha Kanoon - The novel Indian Anti rape laws in the making. Poiliticians take their cozy positions under feminist pressure


Here is the full video of the programme that was aired live on 14 March 2013, featuring the positions taken by Congress, BJP, Women activists, Jat Sanghs, Social workers (feminist mindset) and lawyers.
No representataion from Men Rights organisations were taken as usual!!!
Is'nt it really required ??????

Full Video @


 बला न बन जाए बलात्कार कानून!


मंत्रियों के समूह ने बलात्कार विरोधी कानून का मसौदा तैयार कर दिया है और गुरुवार को इसे कैबिनेट में रखा जा रहा है लेकिन बलात्कार के खिलाफ सख्त कानून के नाम पर जिस तरह से आपसी सहमति से संबंध बनाने की उम्र 18 से 16 किया गया है उस पर सवाल खड़े हो गए हैं. इसके अलावा जिस तरह के आरोपों को गैर जमानती बनाया गया है उससे भी मुश्किल खड़ी हो सकती है. मतलब अब सरकार ने संबंध बनाने के लिए विवाह योग्य उम्र की वर्जना तोड़ने की तैयारी कर ली है. 16 साल में शादी नहीं कर सकते लेकिन संबंध बना सकेंगे. शादी की उम्र लड़कों के लिए 21 साल है. शादी छोड़ दीजिए 16 साल में एडल्ट श्रेणी की फिल्म तक नहीं देख सकते लेकिन संबंध बना सकते हैं, 16 साल में शराब नहीं पी सकते लेकिन शारीरिक संबंध बना सकते हैं.
अब देखिए है किस ज़ुर्म पर कितनी सजा है मंत्री समूह से पास किए गए एंटी रेप कानून में. रेप पर उम्र कैद, तेज़ाब फेंकने पर उम्र कैद, नाबालिग से दुष्‍कर्म पर उम्र कैद, लेकिन जो हाहाकारी है वो ये कि इस कानून में ज़्यादातर गुनाहों को ग़ैर जमानती बना दिया गया है.
मतलब कोई पुरुष ट्रैफिक जाम में फंस गया हो और इत्तेफाक से उसकी कार किसी महिला की कार के पीछे हो तो महिला उसपर पीछा करने का आरोप लगा सकती है और उसकी जमानत नहीं होगी.
इसी तरह आप किसी महिला को पहचानने की कोशिश कर रहे हों और महिला को ये पसंद न आए तो वो उसे 100 नंबर डायल करके अंदर करा सकती है. अगर कोई पुरुष काम करते हुए किसी महिला की तरफ बीच-बीच में देख लेता है तो वो गैर जमानती अपराध का भागीदार है और पुलिस के लिए महिला का बयान आख़िरी होगा. हद ये है कि अगर महिला झूठी निकली तो उसके खिलाफ कोई कार्रवाई नहीं होगी.
कैबिनेट से पास होने के बाद एंटी रेप कानून सर्वदलीय बैठक में रखा जाएगा और वहां से सहमति असहमति के बाद संसद में लेकिन सवाल है कि इस कानून में बचाव की नीयत ज़्यादा है या भय की भूमिका.


Source

Feminism is Talibanism -Radical feminists groups in India had Orchestrated the Delhi gang rape incidence hype and now hijack the proposed Anti rape law by successfully trapping the media hype and Politicians.

Radical feminists groups in India had Orchestrated the Delhi gang rape incidence hype and now  hijack the proposed Anti rape law by successfully trapping the media hype and Politicians.

Media anchors along with the hardcore veteran radical feminist panelists who themselves act as super anchors doesnt allow anyone who oppose their Misandrist mindset.

Here is classical example of the debate on CNN IBN channel's Face The Nation on March 13, 2013,where  the feminists wont allow anyone to go oppsite their wired mindset

http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/378646/ftn-is-it-right-to-lower-the-age-of-sexual-consent-from-18-to-16.html



Govt's anti-rape law 'biased'? Can't trust women?

Watch the first 11 minutes of this programme, Social Networking telecasted on NDTV 13 March 2013 @6.30 pm



Here the anchor lets Kavita Krishnen, Secretary, All India Progressive Women’s Association, get away with anything and everything. Ohh , the Women NGO were exclusively and constantly monitoring the Emp GOM meet via video conference, so in a way it is the Women radical feminist (Are they the same who orchestrated the Delhi gnag rape hype and also seemingly hijacked the Justice Verma committe)who are making the law and the ministers have allowed themselves to be used as mere pawns at the hands of these Big Bindi sirens who are openly threatening and challenging the VOTE bank hungry Mininsters. Shame on those who make criminal laws in a hurry and under pressure tactics





The Last Word: Has confusion over anti-rape bill undermined govt's image, sincerity? on CNNIBN, The Last word - Hosted by Karan Thapar telecasted on 12 march, 2013

Panelist 
Vrinda Grover, Women activist lawyer
G Subramnium, Member JVC
Abhishek manusinghvi, Congress Spokes spokesman


Feminists groups and women rights activists, mocks and threats of mutiny if govt or anyone oppose them and dares to support the gender neurality and misuse clause of Proposed Anti rape law.
Video link
 

http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/378386/the-last-word-has-confusion-over-antirape-bill-undermined-govts-image-sincerity.html

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

GoM succumb to feminist pressure tactics. Misuse clause removed from Anti rape law


GoM succumb to feminist pressure tactics. Makes Anti rape law highly Gender biased and removing the  Misuse clause

Here is the News flashed on News 24 news channel as Breaking news on 13 march 2013



Anti-rape Bill: Group of ministers lowers age of consent for sex to 16 years

NEW DELHI: Sorting out differences, a group of ministers (GoM) on Wednesday night recommended lowering of age of consent for sex from 18 to 16 years and suggested stern punishment for offences like stalking.

Working speedily, the GoM completed its task in the second meeting, paving the way for consideration of the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill by the Union Cabinet on Thursday.

The age of consent for sex was one of the highly contentious provisions in the Bill, because of which it was referred by the Cabinet to the GoM on Tuesday.

"We have gone through every provision of the proposed bill and all issues have been resolved. Now the matter will go to Cabinet tomorrow and hopefully it will be passed tomorrow," telecom minister Kapil Sibal told reporters.

At today's GoM meeting, there was consensus on lowering the age from 18 to 16 years, subject to approval by Parliament.

Women and child development minister Krishna Tirath had been opposing any move to lower the age of consent.

The GoM, chaired by finance minister P Chidambaram, also recommended that sustained stalking be made a non-bailable offence while first offence of voyeurism could be a bailable offence, sources said.

Repeat offences of voyeurisn, inappropriate touch, gesture and remarks have been recommended as non-bailable offences, they said.

The GoM also decided to retain the term 'rape' in the bill and treat it gender-specific, instead of the proposal to make it gender-neutral.

Provisions seeking strong action against those filing false complaints were dropped from the draft Bill, the sources said adding that there was consensus in the GoM that existing laws were adequate for dealing with such cases and it was only a matter of enforcing them.

The Bill will replace Criminal Laws Ordinance promulgated on February 3 in the wake of public outrage over the December 16 Delhi gang rape.

The Ordinance has to be approved by Parliament before its recess from March 22, failing which it would lapse on April 4.

The GoM was also not in favour of replacing the word 'rape' with 'sexual assault' as proposed in the Bill, the sources said.

It also decided to make rape gender-specific, meaning that it could be only against a woman, they said.


Offences such as sodomy can be addressed by the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

Refusing to give details, Sibal said, "there are no differences of opinion".

The GoM was set up in view of persisting differences among ministers on its provisions at the meeting of the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.

However, considering the urgency of the matter, the GoM was asked to submit its report on Wednesday night so that the Bill could be brought before the Cabinet on Thursday.

On the issue of stalking and voyeurism, some ministers were of the view that the provisions would be "prone to misuse" and should only be incorporated after putting in place sufficient safeguards, including harsh penalty for lodging false cases.

Stalking and voyeurism were for the first time defined as criminal offences in the Ordinance.

Some parties like the Samajwadi Party have serious reservations on certain provisions of the ordinance claiming they are prone to misuse.

Lengthy inter-ministerial consultations had taken place on the issue of lowering of the age of consent from 18 years to 16 with the Women and Child Development Ministry strongly opposing the move.

The Bill retains a key provision of the ordinance under which if rape leads to death of the victim or leaves her in a vegetative state, it can also attract death penalty. The minimum punishment is 20 years in jail which may extend upto the "natural life" of the convict. 

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Swaroop Sarkar, SIFF blasts Feminists lies. Debate on Gender Neutrality and Consensual Sex Age issues in Proposed Anti Rape laws. India News 12 March 2013


Swaroop Sarkar, SIFF blasts Feminists lies. Debate on Gender Neutrality and Consensual Sex Age issues in Proposed Anti Rape laws. India News 12 March 2013

(This is recording of the last 10 minutes of  programme which was telecasted live) 




Sms poll result on India News -  Should Consensual Sex Age be lowered to 16 yr ?
YES - 51 %
NO - 49%





Related Media coverage 

Why a gender neutral anti-rape law isn’t anti-women

The question on whether or not rape should be made gender neutral has had many activists up in arms, and is also reportedly a source of conflict between the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Law Ministry, leading to a delay in the introduction of the anti-rape law in Parliament.

Leading women’s rights activist Kavita Krishnan has been one of those who has been against the definition being made gender neutral.

“They are making the law against rape gender-neutral, where the accused is concerned. This means women can now be accused of rape. Now when we were struggling on the streets, was this what we were asking for? Is it a problem is society that women are going around raping men?”, she told Firstpost in an interview.

With all due respect to Ms Krishnan, I strongly disagree.

While it is true that more women get raped and sexually assaulted, it does not mean it does not happen to men at all. Men do get raped – mostly by other men but yes, sometimes by women too. So arguing that the law can be misused is no argument to not pass one at all.

Male rape is in fact, more widespread than many of us think. Delhi gangrape suspect Ram Singh, who allegedly committed suicide on Monday, claimed that he was raped by other male prisoners. And according to Firstpost editor G Pramod Kumar, the problem of male rape in Indian prisons is a real problem:

“The People’s Union of Civil Liberties had this to say about Tihar way back in 1981: “When a young boy enters, the prisoners have been known to have bid a price for the boy. The price offered is in terms of ‘bidis’, soap or charas. Often prisoners have been divided into camps and the groups have fought each other on the issue of who shall have the new entrant.”

The Guardian also did a harrowing story on how male rape is endemic in many of the world’s conflicts.

“Twenty-one per cent of Sri Lankan males who were seen at a London torture treatment centre reported sexual abuse while in detention. In El Salvador, 76% of male political prisoners surveyed in the 1980s described at least one incidence of sexual torture. A study of 6,000 concentration-camp inmates in Sarajevo found that 80% of men reported having been raped” the report said.

But male rape is not just restricted to extraordinary situations like war and prison.

A 2012 psychology study noted that “Victim surveys of British and American males have shown that 3 to 8 percent of males reported at least one adulthood incidence of sexual assault in their lifetimes with at least 5 to 10 per cent of all rape victims being male”

A provocative Stanford university study titled ‘psychology of men and masculinity‘ which states that there are several ‘myths’that often lead to the perception that male rape is not a ‘real’ phenomenon. These include beliefs like:

- Men cannot be raped
- “Real” men can defend themselves against rape
- Men are not affected by rape (or not as much as women)
- A woman cannot sexually assault a man
- Male rape only happens in prisons

One possible solution has been to at least recognise that men can be rape victims, even if the law does not see women as perpetrators. This would at least allow male victims to seek redress under law when they are raped by other men. This is vastly better than taking men out of the equation altogether.

However it is my belief that making a law gender neutral should not be seen as yet ‘another tool’ with which to attack women. Instead it should be viewed as a tool to protect male victims and encourage them to come forward and seek justice under India’s legal system. Taking away their right to seek redress under law is just another form of discrimination, and is in no way a victory either for women or the cause of feminism.





एंटी रेप लॉ पर नहीं है एक राय - NDTV



रेप के खिलाफ कानून पर मतभेद बरकरार - NDTV



Women's safety a priority? Anti-rape law still in discussion - NDTV

Saturday, March 9, 2013

महिलाओं पर अपराध, बदले हैं हालात?

प्राइम टाइम : महिलाओं पर अपराध, बदले हैं हालात?




8 मार्च को अंतरराष्ट्रीय महिला दिवस के मौके पर एक बार फिर देश में महिला से जुड़े मुद्दों पर चर्चा आरंभ हो गई। आखिर क्या कुछ बदलाव आ रहा है। महिलाओं को हक कब मिलेगा... इन्हीं सब मुद्दों पर प्राइम टाइम में चर्चा...

Source NDTV - http://www.ndtv.com

Can be also downloaded directly from - http://bitcast-b.bitgravity.com/ndtvod/23372/ndtv/08032013_i_PrimeShowPrimeTimeHIn_Merge_210021_107035.mp4